Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:06

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
WWDC 2025: New Features We Could See in watchOS 26 - MacRumors
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Smell and sight can spot Parkinson’s disease years earlier, study finds - The Brighter Side of News
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Reports: Bills RB James Cook ‘won’t be in Buffalo anytime soon’ - Buffalo Rumblings
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Mars isn’t Red? The Planet is Actually… - The Daily Galaxy
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Asian Stocks Start Cautious, Dollar Holds Drop: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What is it like to date a women 20 years younger than yourself?